The numerical score provided by standardized frameworks for evaluating the severity of security vulnerabilities alone offers a complete representation of the risk to the organization and should alone be used to set the priority for updates and patches.
This claim is incorrect; additional organizational context is required to determine the true risk and set priorities.
This claim is correct; the numerical score alone sets the definitive risk level and priority for patch management.
The assertion is incorrect. While numerical scores from standardized frameworks give an initial severity rating of vulnerabilities, they do not account for an organization's unique environment, the value of the affected assets, or the likelihood of the vulnerability being exploited. Organizations must consider these additional factors, including the potential impact on business operations and overall risk, before setting the priority for updates and patches. This ensures a more accurate and contextual prioritization.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are standardized frameworks for evaluating security vulnerabilities?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is organizational context important in assessing security vulnerabilities?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are some potential impacts of prioritizing updates based solely on numerical vulnerability scores?