Implementing a compensating control is always considered less secure than applying the original security control intended for risk mitigation.
True
False
The correct answer is false. Implementing a compensating control is not always considered less secure than applying the original security control. The purpose of a compensating control is to provide an alternative measure of protection when an organization cannot implement the preferred security control due to various constraints. While compensating controls may not always offer the same level of protection, they are designed to alleviate risk adequately when deployed correctly. In some scenarios, they can be equally effective or even more so, depending on the context and how they are implemented.
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Join premium for unlimited access and more features
All plans include the following perks.
Our pricing is simple. Full access to all certifications and exams, for one price.
As many practice tests for as many topics as you want.
Use study mode non-stop, no limits.
No annoying ads and popups. Study without distractions.
Track your scores over time in study mode and report cards.
See how you improve over time, and where you need to focus.
Access our store with even more discounts than before.
Unlimited access to all PBQs and be prepared for the real thing.
Create an account or sign in to access our study materials.