A photography company wishes to archive its extensive library of high-resolution images, which are rarely accessed but must be preserved for long-term storage. Which AWS service should they use to store these images at the lowest cost while ensuring that they remain available when needed, even if retrieval times are longer?
Amazon S3 Glacier is the correct answer because it provides secure, durable, and low-cost storage designed for data archiving and long-term backup. It suits the scenario of storing high-resolution images that are infrequently accessed. Amazon S3 Glacier offers retrieval times from minutes to hours, which is acceptable in this context.
Amazon S3 Standard is not the best choice because it is designed for frequently accessed data and has higher storage costs compared to Amazon S3 Glacier. Amazon EFS is suitable for file-based storage, not for archiving, and Amazon EBS provides block storage volumes for use with EC2 instances, which also doesn't correspond to archival needs.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is Amazon S3 Glacier?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does the retrieval process work in Amazon S3 Glacier?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the differences between Amazon S3 Glacier and Amazon S3 Standard?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
AWS Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02
Cloud Technology and Services
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
IT & Cybersecurity Package Join Premium for Full Access