The correct answer is 'Deploy both containers within a single pod'. In Kubernetes, a Pod represents one or more containers that should be run together. Containers within the same pod share the same IP address, network, and storage resources, which means they can communicate with each other using 'localhost' and can access shared volumes. This is the exact scenario described, making it the ideal solution. The other options do not correctly represent how containers are co-located to share resources in the Kubernetes context. Creating separate pods for each container would not allow them to share network and storage resources directly. Configuring a service or deploying a DaemonSet would not target the issue at hand, which is the shared network and storage for closely related containers.