You are performing a penetration test on a web application that requires testing for Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. You need to select a tool that allows for both automated scanning and the ability to intercept and modify HTTP requests in real-time to test for reflected XSS. Which tool would be the best fit for this specific requirement?
Burp Suite is the correct answer because it offers a full suite of web application testing tools, including an automated scanner for identifying vulnerabilities like XSS and an intercepting proxy for real-time HTTP request manipulation, which is crucial for testing reflected XSS. OWASP ZAP also provides similar features, but Burp Suite is typically recognized for its more advanced manual testing capabilities, including intercepting and modifying HTTP requests, making it the better match for the requirement specified in the question. Nikto is mainly a web server scanner and is not designed for intercepting HTTP traffic or digging deep into specific vulnerability classes such as XSS. Gobuster is focused on brute-forcing URIs, DNS subdomains, and virtual host names on target web servers and does not provide the required functionality for testing XSS vulnerabilities.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the capabilities of Burp Suite that make it suitable for testing XSS?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does OWASP ZAP compare to Burp Suite for testing XSS?