During a security assessment of a web application, you notice that carefully crafted inputs that should result in server-side errors do not produce discernible changes in the application's output. To confirm your suspicions of a potential back-end data store vulnerability, which technique would be most effective given the lack of informative responses?
You selected this option
Send an input that would typically generate an error and check for specific error messaging in the response.
You selected this option
Rely on automated tools using common payloads that produce detailed error messages to identify potential data extraction points.
You selected this option
Input crafted payloads that result in immediate reflection in application output to validate execution against the server's data handler.
You selected this option
Initiate a timing attack by sending a payload designed to trigger a delay in the application response indicative of successful execution on the data store.
The correct approach in this scenario is to utilize a time-based technique, such as crafting payloads that make the server wait for a certain amount of time before responding (e.g., through a command like SLEEP). The presence of a delay would suggest that the payload was executed, confirming the vulnerability without the need for an error message. Attempting to cause errors or expecting instantaneous feedback are typical signs of standard vulnerabilities and not suitable for scenarios where the application suppresses error details.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a timing attack and how does it work?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are error messages sometimes suppressed in web applications?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What other techniques can be used to test for vulnerabilities in web applications?