Multistate Bar Examination Practice Test
NCBE: Multistate Bar Examination (MBE)
Use the form below to configure your Multistate Bar Examination Practice Test. The practice test can be configured to only include certain exam objectives and domains. You can choose between 5-90 questions and set a time limit.

Multistate Bar Examination Information
National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) Multistate Bar Examination (MBE)
The Multistate Bar Examination (MBE) is a standardized test developed by the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE). It is a key component of the bar exam in most U.S. jurisdictions and assesses fundamental legal principles and reasoning skills. The MBE is designed to evaluate a candidate’s ability to apply legal principles and analyze fact patterns across multiple areas of law.
Exam Overview
The MBE consists of 200 multiple-choice questions administered over two three-hour sessions on a single day. Of these, 175 questions are scored, while 25 are unscored pretest questions. The test is divided into two parts: 100 questions in the morning session and 100 in the afternoon. The exam is typically offered twice a year, in February and July. The score required to pass varies by jurisdiction.
Exam Content
The MBE covers seven key areas of law: constitutional law, contracts, criminal law and procedure, evidence, real property, torts, and civil procedure. Constitutional law focuses on governmental powers and individual rights. Contracts assess contract formation, performance, breach, and remedies. Criminal law and procedure cover general principles, specific crimes, and constitutional protections. Evidence tests knowledge of relevance, hearsay, and trial procedures. Real property includes ownership, rights, and transfers. Torts cover liability, negligence, and defenses. Civil procedure examines jurisdiction, pretrial procedures, and trial rules.
Who Should Take This Exam?
The MBE is required for most individuals seeking admission to the bar in the United States. It is typically taken by law school graduates as part of their state’s bar examination process. Some jurisdictions require additional state-specific testing alongside the MBE. Candidates should check with their jurisdiction’s bar admissions office for specific requirements.
How to Prepare
Candidates should review the official NCBE MBE Subject Matter Outline and study materials provided by bar preparation programs. Practice exams can help assess knowledge and improve timing. Many candidates use commercial bar review courses, flashcards, and question banks for additional preparation. Studying legal concepts and practicing under timed conditions can help build test-taking skills.
Summary
The NCBE Multistate Bar Examination (MBE) is a critical component of the bar exam in most U.S. jurisdictions. It assesses core legal knowledge and analytical reasoning across seven areas of law. Proper preparation, including practice exams and bar review courses, is essential for success.
Scroll down to see your responses and detailed results
Free Multistate Bar Examination Practice Test
Press start when you are ready, or press Change to modify any settings for the practice test.
- Questions: 15
- Time: Unlimited
- Included Topics:Civil ProcedureConstitutional LawContractsCriminal Law and ProcedureEvidenceReal PropertyTorts
A buyer and seller orally agree to the sale of a commercial property for $500,000. The buyer pays a $50,000 down payment and takes possession of the property, beginning construction of a warehouse. However, no written agreement is ever signed. Later, the seller denies the existence of the agreement and refuses to transfer title. Can the buyer enforce the agreement in court?
Yes, because an oral agreement was made, which demonstrates mutual assent to the sale.
No, because real estate contracts must be in writing to satisfy the Statute of Frauds.
No, because partial payment does not satisfy the essential terms of a real estate contract.
Yes, because the buyer took possession of the property and made a partial payment.
Answer Description
The agreement, though oral, may be enforceable due to the buyer’s partial performance. Under the Statute of Frauds, real estate contracts must generally be in writing to be enforceable. However, an exception exists where partial performance has occurred, demonstrating the existence of the agreement. In this case, the buyer made a down payment and took possession of the property, which are acts consistent with the terms of the oral agreement. The other options are incorrect because they fail to account for the applicability of the partial performance exception or incorrectly assume the mere existence of an oral agreement suffices without actions corroborating it.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the Statute of Frauds?
What constitutes partial performance in a real estate contract?
Why is it important for real estate contracts to be in writing?
A plaintiff brings a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a law that requires specific licensing for independent contractors. After the lawsuit is filed, the plaintiff voluntarily changes professions and no longer works as an independent contractor. The defendant argues the case should be dismissed. What is the most likely reason the court might dismiss the case?
The plaintiff’s original standing to sue was invalidated by their change in profession.
The defendant successfully argued that the licensing law is no longer being enforced.
The lawsuit was filed too late to challenge the constitutionality of the law due to a statute of limitations.
The plaintiff’s change in profession means a court’s decision would no longer address an ongoing legal controversy.
Answer Description
The correct answer is based on the principle that mootness arises when circumstances change such that a court’s decision would no longer have any practical legal effect on the parties. If the plaintiff is no longer impacted by the licensing law, the court cannot provide meaningful relief, rendering the case moot. The incorrect answers mischaracterize the mootness doctrine, confuse it with other justiciability doctrines like standing, or misstate procedural rules unrelated to mootness.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does mootness mean in the context of legal cases?
What is standing, and how is it different from mootness?
Can a case be refiled after it has been dismissed for mootness?
A landowner conveys property "to Alice for life, then to Bob, but if Bob does not survive Alice, then to Carol." What is Alice's interest in the property?
A vested remainder
Fee simple absolute
Fee simple subject to a condition subsequent
A life estate
Answer Description
Alice holds a life estate in the property because the conveyance explicitly states that she has possession of the property for her lifetime. A life estate is a present possessory estate that ends at the death of the life tenant and does not pass to the tenant's heirs. Bob has a vested remainder subject to divestment because his interest in the property is contingent on him surviving Alice. Carol has a shifting executory interest, which will divest Bob's interest if the condition (Bob predeceasing Alice) is met. Fee simple absolute, which grants unrestricted full ownership, is not applicable here as Alice’s ownership is limited to her lifetime, and she cannot transfer the property beyond this interest. A fee simple subject to a condition subsequent is also incorrect because that estate arises in situations where a condition subsequent allows the grantor or their heirs to reclaim the property, which is not the case here.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What exactly is a life estate?
What is a vested remainder subject to divestment?
What distinguishes a fee simple absolute from a life estate?
A software engineer, Alex, failed to implement adequate security measures in a company's application, leading to a data breach that exposed users' personal information. To assess whether Alex breached his duty of care, which of the following standards should be applied?
The standard of an ordinary person in the same situation.
The standard as defined by relevant industry regulations.
The standard of a reasonable software engineer with similar training and experience.
The standard set by the company's internal policies.
Answer Description
The correct standard is that of a reasonable software engineer with similar training and experience. This professional standard reflects the expected conduct of someone in Alex’s position, rather than the standard of an ordinary person or solely the company's internal policies.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'duty of care' mean in the context of software engineering?
What is meant by 'reasonable software engineer with similar training and experience'?
How do industry regulations influence the standards of care for software engineers?
A homeowner posts a flyer offering $500 to anyone who finds and returns her missing dog. A neighbor reads the flyer, finds the dog, and returns it to the homeowner, expecting the reward. However, before returning the dog, the neighbor never contacted the homeowner to confirm they intended to claim the reward. Does the homeowner have an obligation to pay the $500?
Yes, because the neighbor completed the required performance outlined in the offer.
Yes, because offers may create binding obligations upon completion of the requested performance.
No, because the flyer was an invitation to negotiate, not an enforceable offer.
No, because the neighbor failed to notify the homeowner of their intent to accept the offer before performing.
Answer Description
The correct answer reflects the principles governing unilateral contracts. Here, the homeowner's flyer constitutes an offer for a unilateral contract, where acceptance occurs through performance of the requested act — finding and returning the dog. Such contracts do not require advance notification to be binding unless specified by the offeror. The neighbor's performance aligns with the terms of the offer, obligating the homeowner to pay the reward. Incorrect answers misunderstand the requirements for unilateral contracts, either misinterpreting the nature of the flyer or incorrectly assuming that prior communication is necessary.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a unilateral contract?
What does it mean to accept an offer?
What constitutes an enforceable offer in contract law?
A state statute requires all grocery store owners to place warning signs near any wet floors in their establishments. A customer at a grocery store slipped on a wet floor, suffering injuries, and later discovered there was no warning sign in the area. The store owner argued that it is common practice in the area to verbally alert employees but not display signs unless employees report the wet area as dangerous. The customer brings a negligence claim against the store owner. How should the court determine whether the store owner breached their duty of care?
The court should consider whether the warning signs would have prevented the customer’s injury in this specific instance.
The court should determine if the store’s verbal warning practices meet the standard imposed by the statute.
The court should evaluate whether the store owner complied with the statutory requirement to place warning signs near wet floors.
The court should analyze whether the store owner's customs are reasonable and common within the industry.
Answer Description
The court will typically prioritize adherence to statutory guidelines over local customs when determining whether a party breached their duty of care. Statutes establish minimum safety standards designed to prevent harm, and failing to meet such standards creates strong evidence of negligence. A conflict between the statutory rule and customary practice does not absolve liability; rather, the statutory rule prevails. Here, the failure to place a warning sign as required by the statute demonstrates a breach of the owner’s duty of care. While customs may sometimes inform best practices, they cannot override statutory requirements in cases where a reasonable standard of care is legislatively mandated.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are statutory guidelines and how do they affect negligence cases?
What is the difference between statutory duty and common law duty?
Why is it important for the court to prioritize statutes over customary practices?
A property owner has operated a retail store in a district historically zoned for commercial use. Recently, the local government rezoned the area as residential, prohibiting commercial businesses. The property owner continues to operate the store. A neighbor files a lawsuit to enforce the new zoning laws and stop the store’s operation. Can the property owner continue running the retail store under the law?
No, the property owner must cease operations because prior noncompliant uses are prohibited after the zoning change.
Yes, but the property owner must show that the zoning board issued a specific exception for their use.
Yes, the property owner may continue the retail operation because the use was established legally before the zoning change.
No, because property owners are required to conform to zoning laws upon enactment.
Answer Description
The correct answer reflects the Doctrine of Nonconforming Use, which allows property owners to continue a use that was legally established before a zoning change renders it noncompliant. This principle prevents unfair retroactive application of zoning laws that could disrupt investment-backed expectations. Incorrect answers fail to acknowledge this protection, misstate how zoning changes affect prior legally established uses, or overstate the requirement for explicit exemptions. The correct application of this doctrine depends upon the use being lawful before the zoning change and not having been materially altered or abandoned after the change.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the Doctrine of Nonconforming Use?
What are the implications if a nonconforming use is abandoned?
What happens if a property owner wants to alter a nonconforming use?
Owning property in fee simple guarantees that no legal or private restrictions will apply to the property.
False
True
Answer Description
This statement is false. Although fee simple ownership represents the most complete and absolute interest in real property permitted under the law, it does not guarantee freedom from legal or private restrictions. Governments may impose zoning laws, regulations, and taxes, while private agreements like covenants or easements may also place restrictions on the property. The fee simple itself refers to ownership without conditional or temporal limits, but it does not negate external restrictions.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are zoning laws and how do they affect property ownership?
What are easements and how do they affect my property rights?
What are covenants in property law?
Congress passed a federal statute authorizing the president to impose economic sanctions on any foreign country that engages in cyberattacks against the United States. The law further delegates to the president the discretion to determine the scope and duration of such sanctions. After a significant cyberattack by a foreign nation, the president implemented severe trade restrictions on that country. The country challenges the measures in a U.S. court, arguing that Congress improperly delegated its authority to the president. Is this delegation constitutional?
No, the delegation is unconstitutional because Congress has limited discretion when granting authority to the president in matters of foreign relations or war.
No, the delegation is unconstitutional because Congress has significant responsibility for economic sanctions involving foreign nations.
Yes, Congress has general authority to delegate foreign affairs-related powers to the president due to the president's role in implementing international policies.
Yes, Congress provided guidelines for the imposition of sanctions and delegated the implementation details to the president, which aligns with constitutional principles.
Answer Description
The delegation is constitutional because Congress has considerable authority in foreign affairs, including the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations under the Constitution. Congress can establish broad policy directives and delegate implementing details to the president, provided there is an intelligible principle. Here, Congress defined a triggering condition (cyberattacks) and outlined a broad framework for presidential action, which meets constitutional standards. The incorrect options overlook these principles. One mischaracterizes the limits of congressional discretion in delegation, another downplays the president's role in implementing economic sanctions, and the other inaccurately implies Congress has unlimited flexibility when delegating powers.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is an intelligible principle in the context of legislative delegation?
How does Congress's authority over economic sanctions relate to the president's powers?
What is the significance of the president's role in foreign relations as it pertains to delegation?
In a civil lawsuit, an attorney seeks to introduce a statement from a well-respected medical textbook to support an expert witness's testimony regarding standard medical practices. Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, is this statement admissible as part of the expert's testimony?
No, as access to the textbook could affect the fairness of its use.
Yes, because statements from learned treatises can support an expert's opinion.
No, since statements from written sources may be considered hearsay.
Yes, depending on the relevance of the textbook's publication date.
Answer Description
Statements from learned treatises can be used to support an expert's opinion under the hearsay exceptions outlined in Rule 803(18). This allows experts to reference established knowledge within their field to substantiate their testimony.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are learned treatises and why are they important in court?
How does Rule 803(18) define hearsay in relation to expert testimony?
What impact does the publication date of a textbook have on its admissibility?
A suspect was taken into custody for questioning about a robbery. Before being questioned, the suspect was advised of their rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. The suspect waived these rights and provided a voluntary confession. Later, the suspect claimed the waiver was invalid because the police failed to inform them that their attorney had called the station and was attempting to meet with them. Should the confession be admissible in court?
The confession is inadmissible because the suspect cannot waive their right to an attorney without first consulting with one.
The confession is admissible because the suspect voluntarily waived their rights after being properly advised of them.
The confession is inadmissible because the police were required to inform the suspect that an attorney was attempting to contact them.
The confession is inadmissible because the police initiated questioning after taking the suspect into custody.
Answer Description
The admissibility of the confession hinges on whether the suspect's waiver of their rights was both knowing and voluntary. In this case, the suspect was properly informed of their rights (Miranda warnings) and voluntarily waived them. The Supreme Court has held that the police are not required to inform a suspect that an attorney is seeking to contact them unless the suspect expresses a desire for an attorney. The failure to inform the suspect of the attorney's call does not invalidate the waiver. The incorrect answers focus on misconceptions of the law, such as requiring police to disclose attempts by an attorney to contact the suspect or assuming that waiving the right to an attorney automatically invalidates a confession.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are Miranda warnings?
What does it mean to waive one's rights?
What happens if a suspect wants an attorney during questioning?
An office supply store mailed a flyer to local businesses advertising a special promotion on paper reams. The flyer stated: 'Paper reams on sale this week for $20 per box, while supplies last.' A business owner saw the flyer and drove to the store, intending to buy 10 boxes. On arrival, the owner discovered the store had sold out of paper. Is the store obligated to provide 10 boxes of paper to the business owner at the advertised price?
No, because the flyer is an advertisement, which is generally considered an invitation to deal rather than a binding offer.
No, because the contract was not performed within a reasonable time.
Yes, because an advertisement at a specified price creates a contractual obligation to fulfill orders.
Yes, because the flyer constituted a clear offer that the business owner accepted by going to the store.
Answer Description
The flyer distributed by the office supply store is considered an 'invitation to deal' rather than a binding offer. Under contract law, advertisements and promotional materials typically do not constitute offers because they lack specificity and, in many cases, are not intended to create immediate binding obligations. Instead, they are invitations to customers to make an offer by, for instance, going to the store or contacting the seller. The store had no obligation to deliver the specified number of boxes at the advertised price because the advertisement did not constitute a definite offer. Other answers are incorrect because they rely on a misunderstanding of the binding nature of advertisements or ignore the fact that a contract requires a clear offer and acceptance.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the difference between an invitation to deal and a binding offer in contract law?
What are the legal principles that govern advertisements in relation to the formation of contracts?
Are there any exceptions to the rule that advertisements are not considered offers?
A citizen of State A files a lawsuit in federal court against State B, alleging that State B violated their constitutional rights. State B moves to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that it is immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. Which of the following circumstances would most likely allow the lawsuit to proceed?
The lawsuit is filed in a state court rather than a federal court.
State B has been sued by another state, which has also intervened in this lawsuit in support of the citizen's claims.
The citizen seeks monetary damages, and the violation is alleged to have occurred within the citizen's state of residence.
Congress has expressly abrogated state sovereign immunity by enacting legislation under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment to address constitutional violations.
Answer Description
The correct answer identifies a situation in which Congress properly abrogates state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. When Congress acts under its enforcement powers granted by Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, it can override state sovereign immunity if it creates legislation that is congruent and proportional to addressing violations of constitutional rights, such as equal protection or due process. Other answers are incorrect because exceptions to Eleventh Amendment immunity are limited and require specific conditions, such as consent to be sued or valid congressional abrogation.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is state sovereign immunity?
What is Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment?
What does it mean for legislation to be 'congruent and proportional'?
A carpenter was installing cabinets in a kitchen at a homeowner's house. While working, the carpenter negligently left a toolbox on the top of a crooked table without securing it. A day later, a delivery worker delivering a refrigerator bumped into the table while unloading the appliance, causing the toolbox to slide off and strike the homeowner, resulting in injury. The homeowner sues the carpenter for negligence, arguing the carpenter's actions caused the harm. Should the carpenter be held liable?
No, because more than 24 hours had passed between the carpenter's negligent act and the injury to the homeowner.
Yes, because the carpenter was the last person in direct control of the toolbox, making them liable for all later resulting injuries.
Yes, because the carpenter's negligence in leaving the unsecured toolbox on a crooked table was a foreseeable cause of the homeowner's injury.
No, because the delivery worker's action of bumping the table was an intervening cause that absolves the carpenter of liability.
Answer Description
The correct answer identifies the importance of both 'but for' and proximate cause in establishing liability. The carpenter's negligence (leaving the toolbox unsecured on a crooked table) satisfies the 'but for' test because the injury would not have occurred but for the carpenter's actions. However, proximate cause requires foreseeability: a defendant is only liable for harms that are foreseeable consequences of their actions. The delivery worker's actions, though independent, did not constitute an unforeseeable or superseding cause, as it is foreseeable that an unsecured toolbox might fall when the table is disturbed. Other options misunderstand either the concept of foreseeability or the relationship between actual and proximate causation.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'but for' causation mean in negligence cases?
What is proximate cause and how does it relate to foreseeability?
What is the significance of intervening causes in negligence claims?
A buyer entered into a written agreement with a seller to purchase a rare painting for $50,000. Both parties believed the painting was an original work by a well-known artist. After the sale, the buyer discovered that the painting was a forgery, significantly reducing its value. The seller had no knowledge of the forgery at the time of the sale. The buyer seeks to rescind the contract, claiming that the mistake about the authenticity of the painting renders the contract unenforceable. Which legal principle best determines whether the contract is voidable?
The contract is voidable because both parties were operating under a mutual mistake of fact about the authenticity of the painting.
The contract is enforceable because the seller had no knowledge of the forgery at the time of the sale.
The contract is voidable because the seller failed to disclose that the painting was a forgery.
The contract is unenforceable because the buyer was mistaken about the value of the painting.
Answer Description
The correct answer addresses the distinction between mutual and unilateral mistakes. In this scenario, both parties were operating under the same false assumption about a fundamental fact (authenticity of the painting), making it a mutual mistake. Under contract law, mutual mistakes about a material fact can render a contract voidable. However, if the mistake had been unilateral (one party's error), the contract would generally remain enforceable unless the non-mistaken party knew or should have known of the mistake. Answers involving fraud or misrepresentation are incorrect because there is no evidence of deceit or failure to disclose relevant information by either party.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a mutual mistake in contract law?
How does a unilateral mistake differ from a mutual mistake?
What role does materiality play in determining if a contract is voidable?
Woo!
Looks like that's it! You can go back and review your answers or click the button below to grade your test.