Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Practice Test
NCBE MPRE
Use the form below to configure your Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Practice Test. The practice test can be configured to only include certain exam objectives and domains. You can choose between 5-100 questions and set a time limit.

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Information
The Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE), administered by the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE), is a vital step on the path to becoming a licensed attorney in the United States. Although often overshadowed by the more comprehensive bar exam, the MPRE plays a role in ensuring that prospective lawyers understand the ethical and professional responsibilities associated with legal practice. Whether you’re a law student planning ahead or a candidate preparing to sit for the test, understanding the MPRE’s purpose, format, and significance can help demystify the process and enhance your readiness.
What Is the MPRE and Why Does It Matter?
The MPRE is designed to measure a candidate’s understanding of established standards related to a lawyer’s professional conduct. It is not a test of state-specific ethics rules but is based largely on the American Bar Association’s (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct. These frameworks form the basis of legal ethics in nearly every U.S. jurisdiction, making the MPRE a universal assessment of a lawyer’s professional responsibility.
Most jurisdictions require a passing MPRE score as a prerequisite to sitting for the bar exam or gaining admission to the bar. Only Wisconsin and Puerto Rico currently waive this requirement, and California and Maryland have their own standards. Because professional ethics are at the heart of the legal profession—where client trust, judicial integrity, and fair representation are paramount—the MPRE ensures that all aspiring attorneys have a baseline understanding of these principles before practicing law.
Who Should Take the MPRE and When?
The MPRE is typically taken by law students after they have completed a course in Professional Responsibility, often during their second or third year of law school. While there are no formal prerequisites in terms of coursework, having a solid foundation in the ethical rules and legal standards that govern professional conduct is strongly recommended before sitting for the exam.
Each jurisdiction sets its own deadline for when the MPRE must be passed in relation to the bar exam, so timing is crucial. For many, taking the MPRE at least a year before the bar exam offers peace of mind and allows time to retake it if needed. Since it is offered three times per year—in March, August, and November—students have flexibility in scheduling the exam around their studies and internships.
MPRE Format and Structure
The MPRE consists of 60 multiple-choice questions, 50 of which are scored and 10 unscored pretest items used to evaluate future questions. Test takers have two hours to complete the exam, and it is administered digitally at Pearson VUE testing centers nationwide.
Questions cover a variety of ethical scenarios and may involve judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and law firm settings. The key topics tested include:
- Regulation of the Legal Profession
- Client-Lawyer Relationship
- Conflicts of Interest
- Competence, Legal Malpractice, and Civil Liability
- Litigation and Other Advocacy Duties
- Client Confidentiality
- Judicial Conduct
While the questions are multiple-choice, they often involve nuanced fact patterns that test an individual’s judgment and ability to apply rules appropriately. For this reason, memorization of rules alone is not sufficient—understanding context and how rules interact is critical.
MPRE Scoring and Passing Requirements
MPRE scores range from 50 to 150, with the national median score typically falling around 100. Each jurisdiction sets its own passing score, usually between 75 and 86. For example, New York and California require a minimum passing score of 85, while some states require only 75.
Scores are scaled based on question difficulty, meaning that a raw score of correct answers is adjusted depending on the test version’s complexity. This ensures fairness across different administrations of the exam.
It’s important to note that jurisdictions generally require a candidate to achieve a passing MPRE score within a specific time frame relative to their bar application. Failing to meet this requirement can delay bar admission even if a candidate passes the bar exam itself.
Free Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Practice Test
Press start when you are ready, or press Change to modify any settings for the practice test.
- Questions: 20
- Time: Unlimited
- Included Topics:Regulation of the legal professionThe client-lawyer relationshipClient confidentialityConflicts of interestCompetence, legal malpractice, and other civil liabilityLitigation and other forms of advocacyTransactions and communications with persons other than clientsDifferent roles of the lawyerSafekeeping funds and other propertyCommunications about legal servicesLawyers’ duties to the public and the legal systemJudicial conduct
A lawyer represents a client who demands that the lawyer file a lawsuit against a former business associate. The lawyer’s investigation suggests that the case lacks factual support. The client states that the law is never certain and wants to file the suit to encourage a settlement. Is the lawyer permitted to file the lawsuit?
No, the lawyer should not bring a claim that the lawyer believes is unfounded
Yes, because the client wants to pursue the lawsuit based on the client’s strategic considerations in settlement negotiations
No, because it is clear this client is acting irrationally
Yes, a lawyer must file the lawsuit if the client strongly insists on that course of action
Answer Description
The correct answer states that a lawyer should not pursue a case that the lawyer believes lacks factual support. Professional rules prohibit bringing frivolous lawsuits. If the claim appears to be unfounded, the lawyer must not proceed, even if the client is adamant. One option incorrectly suggests that client demands alone justify filing the suit, which fails to recognize the lawyer’s responsibility to lodge only meritorious claims. Another indicates a lawyer must follow the client’s instructions no matter what, but lawyers must use independent professional judgment and cannot file a baseless lawsuit.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are frivolous lawsuits?
What is the lawyer's duty regarding independent professional judgment?
What can a lawyer do if a client insists on filing a baseless lawsuit?
An attorney starts representing a new client and receives an advance fee before performing any legal work. The attorney is unsure how to handle this money. Which option describes a proper approach?
Send the check back to the client until the attorney can justify withdrawing the money
Record the client’s advance in the firm’s operating account with detailed notes
Include the client’s advanced fee in the same operating account, labeled under the client’s name
Deposit the advance in a separate account designated for client payments
Answer Description
Attorneys need to place unearned fees in a dedicated account held for client funds. This prevents mixing client money with the firm’s operating resources and ensures the attorney does not treat the funds as personal property before they are earned. Placing advanced funds in an operating account is not permissible, even if meticulously recorded, as it could lead to claims of mismanagement or commingling. Returning the check to the client is not an acceptable way to handle the funds. Finally, labeling the deposit within the operating account does not protect the client’s property or comply with the rules for safeguarding the money.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why must attorneys use a separate account for client funds?
What is commingling, and why is it prohibited?
What happens if an attorney improperly handles a client’s advance fee?
Kim is negotiating a licensing agreement for a client’s new software. Kim is also developing a separate software product that competes with the client’s technology. What is the proper step under ethics rules in this situation?
Explain the concern, obtain the client’s informed consent in writing, or end the representation.
Call your jurisdiction's ethic's hotline.
Stop representing the client even if the client is willing to continue.
Do nothing because the lawyer’s venture and the client’s licensing deal involve different entities.
Answer Description
A lawyer must address personal conflicts that compromise the duty of loyalty. Disclosure of the situation and informed client consent may resolve the conflict, or the lawyer may need to withdraw if the client does not consent. One answer is incorrect because it ignores the need to tell the client about the competing venture. Another answer is incorrect because ethical rules do not force a lawyer to exit every time a personal interest is involved if informed consent is available.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the duty of loyalty for lawyers?
What qualifies as informed consent in legal ethics?
What steps should a lawyer take when personal interests conflict with client representation?
Attorney Drake, a personal injury practitioner, obtains the telephone numbers of individuals recently listed in accident reports and calls them to promote representation. Which approach aligns best with requirements governing this type of outreach?
Continue placing calls if no one complains, since the individuals’ contact details are publicly available
Send letters or other written messages marked as promotions and refrain from making calls to the individuals who did not request information
Rely on staff members to phone individuals to offer representation under a different name
Travel to the accident victim's homes to discuss their rights and treatment
Answer Description
Under ethical rules, personal solicitation by telephone for profit is disfavored unless a previous or close relationship exists or the prospective client initiates contact. Written messages labeled as promotions are generally acceptable and less intrusive. Proceeding with unauthorized phone calls, whether by the attorney or through staff, can violate rules limiting direct contact for financial gain.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why are phone calls considered disfavored under ethical rules for outreach to prospective clients?
What kind of written communications are permissible for client solicitation?
Are there circumstances where personal visits to discuss legal representation would be allowed?
Carla is representing a client defending a partnership dispute. Opposing counsel proposes terms that Carla views as poor. She chooses not to tell the client. Weeks later, the client learns of the proposed terms from a friend who overheard discussions. Which statement best describes Carla’s obligation?
Carla opts to discard a proposed arrangement she considers substandard without consulting her client
Carla keeps her client informed about meaningful terms from the other side, giving the client an opportunity to decide how to respond
Carla can withhold propositions to better allow her negotiations.
Carla waits for the client to raise questions before sharing details she receives from the other side
Answer Description
Lawyers provide significant information so that clients can decide how to proceed. Ignoring a proposed arrangement because it is viewed as inadequate disrupts the client’s opportunity to respond before dismissing it. Waiting for the client to inquire shifts the lawyer’s proactive duty to the client, which undermines the principle of adequate communication.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why must lawyers keep clients informed about proposed terms?
What is the lawyer's proactive duty in communication with clients?
What happens if a lawyer disregards a proposal they view as inadequate?
An attorney receives a deposit check from a real estate transaction involving a client. A broker claims a portion of the deposit as commission, but the client disputes that claim. Which approach is consistent with an attorney's duty regarding property claimed by a non-client?
Distribute the deposit to the client upon request, leaving the broker to pursue independent legal action.
Place the deposit in the attorney's business account and subtract the broker's claim if the dispute is resolved in the broker's favor.
Separate the disputed portion of the deposit in the trust account until the matter is resolved, disbursing what is not contested once appropriate.
Provide the deposit to the broker, then direct the broker to give a refund to the client if the dispute is resolved in the client's favor.
Answer Description
Under ABA Model Rule 1.15(e), when a lawyer possesses property in which both a client and a third person assert interests, the lawyer must keep the disputed portion separate in a trust account until the dispute is resolved. The lawyer should promptly distribute any portion that is not in dispute. Giving all funds to either claimant before resolution ignores the other party's potential rights, and placing the money in the lawyer's business or personal account would commingle client funds with the lawyer's own, violating Rule 1.15(a). Retaining only the disputed amount in the trust account protects all parties while allowing undisputed funds to be disbursed.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a trust account, and why is it important in legal practice?
Why is commingling client funds with a lawyer’s business or personal account prohibited?
What happens if only part of the funds in a trust account is disputed?
Judge Thompson is overseeing a case involving a dispute between two businesses. Outside of official court proceedings, Judge Thompson meets privately with the plaintiff's attorney to discuss the case's details. Is this conduct appropriate under professional judicial standards?
Such meetings are allowed provided they are brief and non-influential.
Engaging in private discussions with one party's attorney is inappropriate under professional judicial standards.
Private discussions are permissible if both parties are aware of them.
It is acceptable under certain conditions, such as when no case-related decisions are discussed.
Answer Description
Private communications between a judge and one party's attorney without the other party present constitute improper ex parte communications. Such interactions can undermine the fairness and impartiality of the judicial process, violating ethical standards.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are ex parte communications?
Are there any exceptions to the prohibition on ex parte communications?
What are the consequences of a judge engaging in ex parte communications?
Attorney Smith receives a request from a colleague to refer a client to a specialized immigration lawyer. In return, the colleague offers Smith a percentage of any fees earned from the case. What should Smith do in this situation?
Accept the referral and share the fee as offered by the colleague.
Refuse to refer the client and report the colleague for unethical behavior.
Decline the referral fee and proceed to refer the client to the specialized immigration lawyer.
Share a minimal percentage of the fee to comply with ethical standards.
Answer Description
Under ABA Model Rule 1.5(e), lawyers from different firms may divide a fee only if the split is proportional to the services each lawyer performs or each lawyer agrees to assume joint responsibility for the matter, the client agrees to the arrangement (including the share each lawyer will receive) and confirms that agreement in writing, and the total fee is reasonable. Model Rule 7.2(b) further provides that, unless those conditions are met, a lawyer may not give or receive anything of value for merely recommending a lawyer's services. Because Smith will perform no work on the case and will not take joint responsibility, accepting a percentage of the fee would be payment solely for the referral and therefore impermissible. Smith should decline the referral fee but may still refer the client.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the primary reason Attorney Smith cannot accept the referral fee?
What is ABA Model Rule 7.2(b) and how does it apply here?
What should Attorney Smith do to handle the client referral ethically?
A lawyer served as the mediator in a contract dispute between two manufacturers. The mediation ended in a written settlement. Several weeks later, one manufacturer asks the lawyer to represent it in litigation against the other manufacturer to enforce the settlement. The opposing manufacturer is willing to consent to the lawyer's representation, provided the consent is memorialized in writing. Under the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, may the lawyer undertake the representation?
Yes, because the mediation is over and a neutral's duties end once the proceeding concludes; no consent is necessary.
No. A lawyer who served as a mediator can never later advocate for either party in the same dispute, even with consent.
Yes. With informed consent from both manufacturers, confirmed in writing, Rule 1.12 permits the lawyer to represent the party in this dispute.
No, unless the lawyer's firm screens the lawyer from the matter and the firm, rather than the lawyer, handles the case.
Answer Description
Yes. Under Model Rule 1.12(a), a lawyer who participated personally and substantially as a mediator may later represent a party in the same matter only if all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing. Because both manufacturers are prepared to give that written, informed consent, the lawyer is not disqualified. The other choices misstate the rule: there is no permanent ban, no additional "cooling-off" period, and no need for screening when the personally disqualified lawyer herself is the one seeking to represent the party.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'informed consent, confirmed in writing' mean under the ABA Model Rules?
What is Model Rule 1.12(a) and what does it regulate?
Why doesn’t screening apply to the lawyer seeking representation here?
A business owner seeks your advice on terminating an employee who has been underperforming for several months despite previous warnings. The owner wants to proceed with the termination while minimizing the risk of a wrongful termination lawsuit. What should you recommend?
Advise the client to document the employee's performance issues and follow the company's termination procedures.
Offer the employee a resignation package as an alternative to formal termination.
Propose terminating the employee after a verbal warning has been issued for performance issues.
Explain to the client that without a written employment contract, termination can proceed without additional procedures.
Answer Description
The correct answer involves advising the client to document the employee's performance issues and follow company policies, which provides a legitimate basis for termination and reduces the risk of wrongful termination claims. The other options either omit essential steps, such as proper documentation and adherence to procedures, or suggest incomplete strategies that do not adequately protect the client from potential legal risks.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is documentation important when terminating an employee?
What are wrongful termination lawsuits and how can an employer avoid them?
What should a company’s termination procedures typically include?
Judge Dagan is overseeing a complex environmental lawsuit involving multiple parties. The judge decides not to read the reports submitted by one side, citing prior familiarity with similar claims. Which action aligns with the requirement to carry out duties with thoroughness and fairness?
Review the cited case law to ensure you fully understand the parties' legal positions
Rely on insights from similar past matters without studying the current submissions in detail
Have a clerk prepare a concise summary that covers only selected arguments
Review submissions from both parties and allow responses as needed
Answer Description
A judge must give thoughtful consideration to the evidence and arguments presented by each party. Ignoring submissions simply because the judge has encountered similar issues before violates the duty of diligence and impartiality. The proper course is to examine the current record, invite responses when clarification is necessary, and base any ruling on a complete and balanced review. Approaches that skip or truncate that review-whether by relying solely on past experience, selective summaries, or case-law research divorced from the actual filings-fall short of the standard.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why does ignoring submissions from one side violate a judge's duty of diligence?
How does reviewing submissions from both parties ensure fairness in legal proceedings?
What is the difference between prior familiarity with similar cases and current case evaluation?
An attorney is defending a real estate developer in a negligence lawsuit. The attorney drafts private memoranda analyzing witness credibility and possible arguments before trial. The opposing side requests these memoranda during discovery. Which statement best describes the status of these documents under the protective rules for an attorney's materials?
They enjoy limited protection only when drafted in the attorney's office and would automatically remain undisclosed.
They fall outside the categories of protected documents and are subject to disclosure upon request.
They have protected status, but a court can allow their discovery if the requesting party shows substantial need and lacks alternative sources.
Such documents are never discoverable under any circumstances.
Answer Description
Materials created by an attorney that reveal strategies, impressions, or analyses and are prepared in anticipation of litigation are generally protected from discovery under the work-product doctrine. A court may order production only when the requesting party shows a substantial need for the materials and cannot, without undue hardship, obtain their substantial equivalent by other means. Even then, the court must protect the portions that disclose the attorney's mental impressions or legal theories, which receive heightened protection.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the work-product doctrine?
What does 'substantial need' mean in the context of discovery?
What types of work product receive heightened protection?
Multiple clients recently reported seeing an online advertisement in which an attorney declared, “Hire us for a better recovery than any other firm.” The ad also describes two previous verdicts that were higher than the average in the region. Which statement accurately addresses whether that communication is permissible?
It is unacceptable if it implies outcomes that are not substantiated and misleads potential clients
It is acceptable when the claim is widely publicized along with online references for potential clients to review
It is acceptable if the attorney lists prior results that support the claim
It is acceptable when the firm includes a disclaimer regarding different outcomes for future clients
Answer Description
Lawyers who advertise must ensure they do not make claims that suggest guaranteed results. Although referencing past trial verdicts may be permissible, boldly assuring a better recovery than any other firm can mislead potential clients if the statement is not substantiated. One answer choice underscores the problems with making such claims without adequate support, whereas the remaining responses allow the statement under various conditions that do not sufficiently resolve the exaggerated promise.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What constitutes misleading advertising for attorneys?
Are attorneys allowed to reference past trial verdicts in advertisements?
What are the consequences of violating attorney advertising rules?
An attorney represents a landlord in a dispute with a property manager. During exchanges with the property manager’s counsel, the attorney states that the landlord never received any rent from the property manager, despite the landlord’s record of partial payments. The attorney believes this statement will lead to a faster resolution. Which statement best describes the ethical implications of the attorney’s behavior?
It was acceptable under certain conditions since a quicker resolution was the goal of the attorney’s assertion.
It was questionable because the attorney presented false information about payments to the other side.
It was allowed if the property manager’s counsel had access to the landlord’s payment records.
It was appropriate because statements during negotiations are generally categorized as opinions.
Answer Description
Attorneys have a duty to maintain honest communications with others. Here, the attorney’s comments conflict with the landlord’s own records, which creates a misleading impression. Tactics during negotiations do not excuse false statements of fact, even if the attorney believes it may hasten a resolution. Regardless of the other party’s awareness or ability to verify the information, an attorney who provides incorrect statements risks a breach of ethical obligations.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What ethical duty does an attorney have in negotiations?
Are opinions during negotiations treated differently than false statements of fact?
What happens if an opposing counsel can verify the false statement?
During settlement discussions concerning a design dispute, an attorney represents a homeowner. The contractor on the opposing side also has counsel. The attorney plans to call the contractor’s project manager to discuss routine procedures. The project manager oversees job-site matters and speaks on behalf of the contractor in contract-related issues. Which approach is best?
Mention that the conversation will avoid legal issues related to liability
Ask the project manager questions restricted to administrative topics
Have a staff member reach out to the project manager, to avoid direct communication
Obtain the contractor’s counsel’s consent before speaking with the project manager
Answer Description
Professional standards limit direct communication with a represented individual unless that person’s counsel consents or another recognized exception applies. The project manager directs significant aspects of the contractor’s work and has decision-making authority, so proceeding with direct outreach lacks the other counsel’s approval. The incorrect options would permit contact that disregards those professional standards or attempts to bypass them by focusing on certain topics.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is it necessary to obtain the opposing counsel’s consent before speaking with a represented party?
What determines if someone is considered a represented party in this context?
Are there any exceptions that allow an attorney to contact a represented party without consent?
Monica is setting up her practice in a new location. She accepts a check from a client who pays an advanced fee for representation. She considers depositing the funds into her operating account, under the label “anticipated costs.” Is it appropriate for her to place these unearned funds in her operating account?
No, advanced funds remain in a separate account while the work is being performed
No, client funds are managed without being held in a special account
Yes, if her client provided an agreement for monthly withdrawals
Yes, if she labels them in her general account ledger
Answer Description
Attorneys keep unearned fees in a separate trust account to avoid mixing them with the attorney’s funds. Placing them in the operating account risks them being treated as already earned. The correct answer clarifies that unearned funds remain in a dedicated account while tasks are performed. The other choices suggest labeling them in a general ledger, relying on an arrangement for withdrawals, or stating that a special account is not used, conflicting with recognized practices for client trust accounts.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a trust account, and why is it important for lawyers?
What are unearned fees, and how should they be handled?
What might happen if an attorney deposits advanced fees into an operating account?
An attorney received a client’s litigation file well before a date set by the court. The attorney worked on other matters and sent the required documents after that date had passed, which prevented the client from pursuing the case. Which choice best describes the attorney’s actions?
The attorney decided to work on the matter after completing a backlog
The attorney followed the intake procedure for new files
The attorney relied on updates from the client to manage scheduling
The attorney did not address the official date, leaving the client unable to proceed
Answer Description
Lawyers are expected to manage their workload effectively. The correct option reflects that missing the specified date stopped the client’s ability to proceed. Other responses either shift focus to different issues or suggest the attorney effectively handled the matter, which did not occur given the late filing.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does it mean for an attorney to manage their workload effectively?
Why are court deadlines so critical in legal practice?
What professional responsibility rules apply when an attorney misses a deadline?
Three attorneys, all licensed in State X, want to practice together by forming a professional corporation that will offer legal services to the public. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct governing ownership and fee sharing in such entities, which of the following proposed arrangements would comply with the rules?
The three lawyers are the sole shareholders and corporate directors.
A non-lawyer holds a minority share of stock in the corporation.
The corporation agrees to pay an outside marketing company a percentage of legal fees as a commission.
Because it is a separate legal entity, the corporation is exempt from the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Answer Description
Under Model Rule 5.4(d), lawyers may practice in the form of a professional corporation only if non-lawyers neither own an equity interest, serve as corporate directors or officers, nor possess the right to direct or control the lawyers' professional judgment. The arrangement in which the three lawyers serve as the sole shareholders and directors satisfies these requirements. All other options violate Rule 5.4 because they involve non-lawyer ownership, impermissible fee sharing, or the incorrect assumption that the corporation is exempt from ethical rules.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why are non-lawyers prohibited from owning equity in law firms under Rule 5.4(d)?
What does Rule 5.4 say about fee sharing with non-lawyers?
Are professional corporations for lawyers exempt from ethical rules?
Attorney Smith is representing Client A in a contract negotiation. During the negotiations, Client B, who is already represented by another attorney, sends an email directly to Attorney Smith to discuss settlement terms without involving their own counsel. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, what should Attorney Smith do in response?
Inform the opposing counsel about Client B's attempt to communicate and await further instructions.
Ignore the email from Client B and continue negotiations without addressing the communication.
Respond directly to Client B, discussing the settlement terms as proposed.
Request Client B's consent to communicate directly without involving their attorney.
Answer Description
Under ABA Model Rule 4.2, a lawyer must not communicate directly with a represented person regarding the subject of the representation without the consent of the person's lawyer. In this scenario, Attorney Smith should refrain from communicating directly with Client B and inform the opposing counsel about the attempted contact.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is ABA Model Rule 4.2?
What are the exceptions to the no-contact rule in ABA Model Rule 4.2?
Why is it important to inform opposing counsel about direct communication attempts?
Jessica, an attorney handling a family law case, receives multiple emails from her client each day requesting updates and advice. Responding to every message is becoming time-consuming and is affecting her ability to manage the case effectively. According to professional responsibility rules, how should Jessica manage her communications with her client?
Set reasonable boundaries for communication methods and frequency, ensuring the client is kept informed while managing the workload effectively.
Limit communication to scheduled meetings and manage email responses outside of business hours appropriately.
Respond to client communications promptly to ensure the client feels supported.
Delegate some client communications to a junior associate to handle routine updates.
Answer Description
Setting reasonable boundaries for communication methods and frequency allows the attorney to keep the client informed while effectively managing the workload. Responding promptly ensures the client feels supported without becoming overwhelming. Limiting communication too strictly or delegating essential communications can hinder effective representation.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are 'reasonable boundaries' for attorney-client communications?
Why can't attorneys delegate essential client communications?
How do professional responsibility rules balance client communication with workload management?
Woo!
Looks like that's it! You can go back and review your answers or click the button below to grade your test.