Scroll down to see your responses and detailed results
Prepare for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect Associate SAA-C03 exam with this free practice test. Randomly generated and customizable, this test allows you to choose the number of questions.
An organization utilizes AWS to encrypt its sensitive data. The security policies state that the encryption keys must be rotated on a regular basis to mitigate the risk of key compromise. Which approach should be implemented to fulfill this requirement while ensuring seamless decryption of both new and existing datasets?
Enable automatic key rotation for the encryption service.
Remove existing keys at each cycle and establish fresh keys for new encryption operations.
Generate and import key material from an external source into the existing key setup on a set schedule.
Manually create a new key and re-encrypt all data periodically.
AWS KMS supports automatic key rotation for customer created keys, which is a feature that allows AWS to automatically rotate the key every 12 months. This automated process creates a new cryptographic material while preserving the old one for decryption operations. This approach does not require re-encryption of existing data and is seamless to the application services. Manually rotating keys or deleting and recreating keys would be complex and risk service disruption or data loss, and importing key material would not pertain to the rotation of existing keys.
A healthcare company stores patient information that includes sensitive records in Amazon S3. They are subject to strict compliance regulations and need an automated way to classify their data at scale and be alerted of any potential exposure risks. Which service should they implement for continuous analysis of their stored content and to receive automated security alerts in case of unsecured sensitive data?
Adopt Amazon Macie for content analysis and automated alerts on insecure data storage.
Implement Amazon GuardDuty for continuous threat detection and data classification in S3.
Use Amazon Cognito to manage patient identity verification and to secure sensitive records.
Configure AWS Secrets Manager for rotating credentials and alerting on data exposure.
Amazon Macie is the AWS service specifically crafted for the purpose of analyzing and securing content that resides within Amazon S3. It uses machine learning and pattern matching to automatically recognize sensitive information such as healthcare records. When it detects unsecured data or abnormal data access patterns, it triggers alerts. This fits the requirement of the healthcare company to keep its patient records secure according to compliance regulations. Amazon GuardDuty is a threat detection service that monitors malicious activities rather than classifying content. While AWS Secrets Manager secures and rotates secrets such as database credentials and API keys, it does not classify or monitor object content within S3. Lastly, Amazon Cognito focuses on user identity management and would not assist with the data classification or monitoring needs of the healthcare company.
Which service facilitates the setup and governance of a multi-account environment by offering automated deployment of baseline environments and compliance auditing against standard best practices?
Organizations
Security Hub
Control Tower
Identity and Access Management
Control Tower is designed to manage multi-account environments by providing an automated way to set up a baseline environment with governance and compliance checks against best practices. While it incorporates elements of account management and identity services, it is distinct in providing automated orchestration for a secure and compliant multi-account setup. Organizations is primarily for account management and billing aggregation, does not automate the setup of a secure environment. Identity and Access Management is critical for defining users and permissions, but does not govern multi-account structures. Security Hub focuses on compiling security findings and does not manage account setup or enforce compliance policies.
Which service feature should you use to manage a large number of concurrent database connections that often experience unpredictable spikes in connection requests, while ensuring minimal changes to the existing applications?
Elastic Load Balancing
Amazon ElastiCache
AWS Direct Connect
Amazon RDS Proxy
Amazon RDS Proxy is designed to handle a large volume of concurrent database connections and smooth out spikes in connection requests to RDS databases. It mitigates database overload by absorbing the connections to create a connection pool and by reducing database failovers through intelligent load balancing. Using RDS Proxy decreases the need to refactor the applications that are not designed to manage such spikes, which distinguishes it from the other answer options that do not offer the same degree of functionality for this specific requirement.
Which service provides user authentication and access control for web and mobile applications, enabling the integration of sign-up and sign-in functionalities?
Amazon Cognito
Amazon Key Management Service
Amazon GuardDuty
Amazon Identity and Access Management
Amazon Cognito is the correct answer as it provides user sign-up, sign-in, and access management for web and mobile applications. It offers an easy way to implement authentication without worrying about the backend infrastructure. IAM is for controlling access to services and resources at a more granular level, KMS is used for managing cryptographic keys, and GuardDuty is a threat detection service, which do not directly offer user management for applications.
A company is storing highly sensitive customer data in Amazon S3 and requires that the data be encrypted at rest. The Chief Security Officer mandates that the encryption solution must allow the company to have full control over the key management process and the ability to rotate encryption keys on a regular basis. Which of the following would BEST meet these requirements?
Use default S3 server-side encryption (SSE-S3) which employs managed keys
Encrypt the data client-side before uploading it to Amazon S3
Use Amazon S3's object lock feature with versioning enabled
Use an AWS managed key in AWS KMS without enabling key rotation
Use a Customer Managed Key in AWS Key Management Service (KMS) with key rotation enabled
AWS Key Management Service (KMS) provides the ability to create and manage encryption keys and control their use across a wide range of AWS services and in your applications. It also supports key rotation, enabling customers to rotate the cryptographic keys they manage on a regular basis, which is a security best practice. Customer Managed Keys (CMKs) offer more management features and the possibility to set the key rotation policy, which aligns with the Chief Security Officer's requirements for having full control over the key management process and the ability to rotate encryption keys.
A fintech startup's web portal has stringent security requirements, demanding SSL termination at the load balancer to offload SSL processing from the web servers. The application also requires the capability to route client requests based on custom HTTP headers and to utilize WebSockets for real-time updates. Considering these criteria, which load balancing option should you, as a solutions architect, suggest for this startup's architecture?
Network Load Balancer (NLB)
AWS Global Accelerator
Amazon CloudFront
Application Load Balancer (ALB)
The Application Load Balancer (ALB) is designed to work at the application layer (Layer 7) of the OSI model and supports content-based routing. It can terminate SSL connections, thus offloading SSL processing from the backend servers, and route traffic based on HTTP headers, which fits the specified requirements. Additionally, ALB has support for WebSocket, which is a protocol providing full-duplex communication channels over a single TCP connection. The Network Load Balancer (NLB) operates at Layer 4 and does not support SSL termination or content-based routing. While Amazon CloudFront supports SSL termination, WebSocket, and can route based on headers, it is primarily a content delivery network, not a load balancer designed to manage application traffic across server resources. Lastly, AWS Global Accelerator improves global application availability and performance but lacks the specified application layer routing capabilities.
Selecting Amazon Neptune for managing relational data structures ensures optimal performance compared to other database services offered by AWS.
True
False
The statement is false because Amazon Neptune is a fast, reliable, fully managed graph database service that is optimized for storing and navigating relationships. It is not designed for typical relational data structures managed by a relational database service (RDBMS) such as Amazon RDS or Amazon Aurora. For relational data structures, services like Amazon RDS or Amazon Aurora are more appropriate as they are optimized for such workloads. Amazon Neptune excels in use cases where relationships between data points are highly connected, such as social networking, recommendation engines, and fraud detection, which are different from the use cases best suited for relational databases.
What is a recommended security measure to prevent unauthorized access to AWS accounts?
Enabling multi-factor authentication for all user accounts
Enforcing complex password requirements
Enforcing IP whitelisting for all user logins
Regularly rotating IAM credentials
Enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA) on all user accounts is a security best practice because it requires both the user's credentials and access to a physical device that generates a time-based code, significantly reducing the risk of unauthorized access. Rotating IAM credentials refers to changing access keys and passwords, which is also a best practice but does not involve the use of a physical device. IP whitelisting and enforced password complexity can enhance security but do not provide the same level of protection against compromised credentials as MFA does.
A digital education provider wants to enhance its platform by offering features that will convert lecture transcriptions into structured data for content categorization and sentiment metrics. The solution should autonomously discover relevant topics and gauge the lecturers' tone. Which service should be utilized to process and analyze the textual information to meet these requirements?
The text-to-speech service
The language translation service
The media conversion service
The natural language processing service
Amazon Comprehend should be used because it is designed to perform complex natural language processing tasks such as sentiment analysis, entity recognition, language detection, and key phrase extraction from text without the need for any machine learning expertise. This service is well-suited for converting unstructured lecture transcriptions into organized data that can be used for content insights and analysis. In contrast, other options like the text-to-speech service, the media conversion service, or the language translation service do not align with the needs of text analysis and insights generation from lecture transcriptions.
A corporation wants to enable its security team to audit resources in all of its subsidiary companies' accounts with minimum necessary permissions. What method should be recommended to facilitate this requirement while adhering to security best practices?
Distribute the superuser credentials for each environment, restricting their use to the audit tasks.
Apply granular resource policies across all services in each environment, allowing audit-level access.
Implement a centralized identity management service, allowing the team to use roles with 'Audit' policy attachments in each of the subsidiary's environments.
Create distinct profiles for team members within each subsidiary's environment, assigning them individual access keys for manual rotation.
Creating a centralized identity account with IAM Identity Center and configuring it to allow the security team to assume predefined roles with audit-level permissions is a scalable and secure approach. It enforces the principle of least privilege and simplifies the management across the organization's accounts.
Providing direct access through different user profiles in each subsidiary's account is not an efficient solution and could lead to management complications. Assigning resource-based policies on a per-service basis can create inconsistencies and lacks central management. Providing the team with root user credentials for the audit function contradicts the best practices of secure account management, where such sensitive credentials should be used sparingly and with the utmost caution.
A company wishes to improve the fault tolerance of their on-premises legacy web application that is currently unable to handle unpredictable increases in user traffic, leading to frequent downtimes. Which service would assist in managing the incoming network traffic more effectively, facilitating higher application uptime with minimal modifications to the existing application?
Lambda
Elastic Load Balancing
Direct Connect
Simple Storage Service
Elastic Load Balancing helps distribute incoming network traffic across multiple targets, such as virtual servers, containers, and IP addresses in different Availability Zones. This process increases the fault tolerance of an application by responding to variations in traffic, ensuring that no single server bears too much load, all without the need to modify the application's code. 'Direct Connect' provides a dedicated network link between on-premises environments and its servers, which may improve network performance but not necessarily the fault tolerance of the application itself. 'Lambda' is a compute service that runs code in response to events, and typically requires changing the application architecture to a serverless model. 'Simple Storage Service' is used for object storage and would not address traffic distribution or fault tolerance for an active web application.
Which service provides the capability to perform automated security assessments to help identify vulnerabilities, ensure compliance with best practices, and monitor ongoing application activities for irregular patterns?
AWS Trusted Advisor
AWS Config
AWS Shield
AWS Inspector
AWS Inspector is designed to perform automated security assessments which help in identifying possible vulnerabilities, non-compliance with best practices, and unusual application activities in real-time. This is vital for maintaining infrastructure integrity and aligns with the need for automated solutions in cloud architecture. Other services like AWS Config, AWS Trusted Advisor, and AWS Shield provide different forms of resource configuration tracking, best practice recommendations, and protection against DDoS attacks, respectively, but they do not offer automated security assessment features with continuous monitoring for irregular application activities.
A company requires minimal data loss and rapid recovery of its critical systems in the event of a disaster, but they operate with a limited budget for DR. Which of the following disaster recovery strategies would be most appropriate for this company's needs?
Active-Active Failover
Pilot Light
Warm Standby
Backup and Restore
The Pilot Light strategy is correct because it involves having a minimal version of an environment always running in the cloud. This strategy allows a company to rapidly scale up this environment to handle full production load in the event of a disaster, ensuring minimum data loss and rapid recovery. The Warm Standby strategy is more costly as it involves a scaled-down but fully functional version of the environment. Both the Backup and Restore and Active-Active strategies do not fit the criteria as well as Pilot Light; Backup and Restore can involve more extensive data loss and longer recovery times, while Active-Active requires full production-scale environments in two locations, significantly increasing cost.
A company requires a database that is highly compatible with Oracle and provides advanced features for fault tolerance and uptime. Which of the following database engines should they consider implementing to meet these specific needs?
PostgreSQL
Amazon Aurora
MySQL
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Aurora provides compatibility with MySQL and PostgreSQL, but is designed to offer greater fault tolerance, recovery, and uptime than the simpler versions of those engines. It also has the capability to scale storage automatically and can survive the loss of up to two copies of data without affecting write availability, and up to three copies without affecting read availability, making it the appropriate choice for high fault tolerance requirements. MySQL and PostgreSQL are traditional database engines that can be used in AWS RDS but don't automatically provide the same level of fault tolerance and scaling capabilities as Aurora. Amazon Redshift is mainly a data warehousing service and doesn't fit the requirement for Oracle compatibility.
Looks like that's it! You can go back and review your answers or click the button below to grade your test.
Join premium for unlimited access and more features