This statement is false. The 'minimum' policy type in SELinux is less restrictive than the 'targeted' policy. While 'targeted' confines many services and daemons on the system, the 'minimum' policy applies mandatory access controls to a lesser extent, providing confinement only to selected high-risk daemons and leaving other parts of the system unconfined. This means that while the 'minimum' policy does offer some level of security, it does not confine processes to the same extent as the 'targeted' policy does.