An organization wants to enhance its vulnerability management program by integrating additional intelligence sources. Which feature of proprietary or third-party threat feeds can be most beneficial when prioritizing vulnerabilities based on the current threat landscape?
Detailed configuration guidelines for a multitude of unrelated software products.
General security best practices that apply to most organizations.
Actionable intelligence that is directly relevant to the organization's environment.
Network traffic data unrelated to the organization's industry vertical.
Proprietary or third-party threat feeds often provide actionable intelligence that can be directly mapped to an organization's existing vulnerabilities. By offering this tailored information, security teams can prioritize threats based on relevance and direct applicability to the organization's environment. This level of specificity assists in making informed decisions, as opposed to more generic information that could lead to misprioritization or resource waste on lower-risk vulnerabilities.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
How do third-party threat feeds provide actionable intelligence?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What methods can organizations use to integrate threat feeds into their vulnerability management program?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is actionable intelligence preferred over general security best practices in vulnerability management?