An organization wants to enhance its vulnerability management program by integrating additional intelligence sources. Which feature of proprietary or third-party threat feeds can be most beneficial when prioritizing vulnerabilities based on the current threat landscape?
Detailed configuration guidelines for a multitude of unrelated software products.
Network traffic data unrelated to the organization's industry vertical.
General security best practices that apply to most organizations.
Actionable intelligence that is directly relevant to the organization's environment.
Proprietary or third-party threat feeds often provide actionable intelligence that can be directly mapped to an organization's existing vulnerabilities. By offering this tailored information, security teams can prioritize threats based on relevance and direct applicability to the organization's environment. This level of specificity assists in making informed decisions, as opposed to more generic information that could lead to misprioritization or resource waste on lower-risk vulnerabilities.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is actionable intelligence in the context of threat feeds?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do third-party threat feeds collect and analyze data?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the risks of relying on general security best practices instead of actionable intelligence?