A company has implemented a new policy requiring IT management to conduct security reviews of all vendors before onboarding them. The reviews need to ensure that the vendors are adhering to the same security standards as the company. Which of the following actions is MOST effective for assessing the vendors' adherence to these standards?
Examining product data sheets for security features.
Reviewing the vendors' privacy policies.
Conducting third-party security audits of the vendors.
Comparing the Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to the company's standards.
Conducting third-party security audits is the most effective way to assess vendors' adherence to security standards. These audits often include an in-depth analysis of the vendors' security policies, practices, and controls. This can provide an objective and comprehensive overview of the vendors' security posture and compliance with relevant standards. Reviewing the vendors' privacy policies is important but may not offer a complete picture of their security practices. Examining product data sheets only provides information about the products and not the vendors' security standards. Comparing SLAs can showcase the guaranteed performance and availability, but it does not directly address security compliance.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why are third-party security audits more effective than simply reviewing a vendor's privacy policies?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the key components of a third-party security audit?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the significance of aligning vendor security audits with industry standards like ISO 27001 or SOC 2?