Your engineering team is preparing a capital request to replace an aging virtualization cluster next quarter. Three vendors have submitted bids for 2U rack servers that meet the required CPU, memory, and storage specifications. Management insists that the purchasing decision account for the full five-year life-cycle cost, including energy consumption, maintenance contracts, and recycling fees when the hardware is retired. Which of the following procurement analyses will BEST satisfy this requirement?
Select the server model with the highest published mean time between failures (MTBF).
Perform a total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis for each vendor bid.
Negotiate a multiyear extended warranty with the least-expensive supplier.
Choose the vendor offering the lowest initial purchase price per server.
A total cost of ownership (TCO) comparison evaluates every cost incurred from acquisition through disposal-including purchase price, power and cooling, support contracts, and end-of-life recycling-so it provides the most accurate basis for a five-year budget. Relying only on the highest advertised MTBF focuses narrowly on reliability, the lowest unit price ignores operating and disposal expenses, and negotiating an extended warranty addresses break-fix coverage but not energy or retirement costs.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is energy consumption important in TCO for servers?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the mean time between failures (MTBF) and why isn’t it sufficient on its own?