A Windows Server 2022 file server becomes unstable after a monthly patch cycle. You have a verified full backup from the previous night. Management instructs you to recover the pre-patch data without interrupting production access and to keep the original files in place so engineers can compare versions before any cut-over occurs. Which restore method should you choose?
Roll back the entire volume with an in-place snapshot
Restore to an alternate location path on a standby server
Perform a side-by-side restore to a new folder on the same server
A side-by-side restore brings the selected backup data back to the same server but places it in a separate folder, volume, or virtual disk. Because the original files remain untouched and online, administrators can validate, test, or compare the restored copy against the production copy before deciding whether to replace it.
An overwrite restore would immediately replace production data, eliminating the chance to validate. Restoring to an alternate location path typically targets a different server or share (often used when the source path is unavailable), so users could not easily compare on the same host. Rolling back with an in-place snapshot reverts the entire volume, again removing the ability to run both versions concurrently.