AWS Certified Solutions Architect Professional SAP-C02 Practice Question
Your company hosts a public API behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB) in the us-east-1 Region. For disaster-recovery (DR) purposes, an identical stack exists in us-west-2. The business must meet an RTO of 15 minutes and wants DNS to fail over automatically if the primary Region becomes unavailable. Operations teams also need to run DR drills by deliberately routing traffic to the secondary Region-without changing client endpoints or adding complex manual steps. Which Amazon Route 53 configuration will satisfy all of these requirements with the least ongoing operational effort?
Create two alias records that use Geolocation routing, mapping all U.S. traffic to the us-east-1 ALB and default traffic to the us-west-2 ALB to achieve predictable routing.
Create two alias records that use Latency-based routing with Evaluate Target Health enabled for both ALBs so that Route 53 sends traffic to the Region offering the best latency.
Create two alias records that use the Failover routing policy: designate the us-east-1 ALB as the primary record and associate it with a health check; designate the us-west-2 ALB as the secondary record. In DR tests, temporarily flip the primary and secondary roles or disable the primary health check to route traffic to the standby.
Create two alias records that use a Weighted routing policy, assigning weight 100 to the us-east-1 ALB and weight 0 to the us-west-2 ALB; adjust the weights manually during outages or DR tests.
Using Route 53 failover routing with primary and secondary alias records meets the RTO because the health check on the primary record causes Route 53 to redirect traffic automatically to the secondary record when the primary ALB is unhealthy. The same configuration lets engineers run controlled DR tests by either temporarily marking the primary health check as failed or swapping the primary/secondary designation, then restoring it after validation-no client-side changes are required.
Weighted routing that assigns 100 percent weight to the primary and 0 percent to the secondary provides no automatic failover; operators would have to adjust weights during an outage and again to fail back.
Latency-based routing chooses the Region with the lowest latency rather than resource health, so it cannot guarantee failover to the standby Region.
Geolocation routing directs traffic based on users' locations, not on endpoint health, and therefore does not fulfill the automatic DR failover objective.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a Route 53 health check?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does Failover Routing work in Amazon Route 53?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is Failover Routing better than Weighted or Latency-based routing for this use case?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
AWS Certified Solutions Architect Professional SAP-C02
Design for New Solutions
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Pass with Confidence.
IT & Cybersecurity Package
You have hit the limits of our free tier, become a Premium Member today for unlimited access.
Military, Healthcare worker, Gov. employee or Teacher? See if you qualify for a Community Discount.
Monthly
$19.99
$19.99/mo
Billed monthly, Cancel any time.
3 Month Pass
$44.99
$14.99/mo
One time purchase of $44.99, Does not auto-renew.
MOST POPULAR
Annual Pass
$119.99
$9.99/mo
One time purchase of $119.99, Does not auto-renew.
BEST DEAL
Lifetime Pass
$189.99
One time purchase, Good for life.
What You Get
All IT & Cybersecurity Package plans include the following perks and exams .