AWS Certified Solutions Architect Professional SAP-C02 Practice Question
A financial-services firm is migrating its on-premises Monte-Carlo risk-analysis workload to AWS. Each simulation launches 500 c7i.16xlarge Amazon EC2 Spot instances in a single Availability Zone. The application must mount a POSIX-compatible shared file system from every instance, deliver sub-millisecond latency and hundreds of thousands of IOPS during a 30-minute processing window, and store 150 TB of input data plus 40 TB of results per run. When a simulation finishes, both the input dataset and the output files must be durably stored in an existing Amazon S3 bucket without any manual copy or synchronization jobs. The team wants the lowest operational overhead and does not want to provision or manage file servers. Which AWS solution will meet these requirements?
Provision a Multi-Attach io2 Amazon EBS volume, mount it on each instance by using a clustered file system, and archive simulation data to the S3 bucket with an S3 Batch Operations job.
Create an Amazon FSx for Lustre file system linked to the S3 bucket with automatic import and export enabled, and mount the file system on all simulation instances.
Deploy an NFS server cluster on Amazon EC2 backed by striped gp3 volumes, and trigger an AWS Lambda function via Amazon EventBridge to copy files to the S3 bucket when jobs complete.
Create a Regional Amazon EFS file system with provisioned throughput, enable Lifecycle Management to move cold data to EFS-IA, and use AWS DataSync to copy data between EFS and the S3 bucket.
Amazon FSx for Lustre is a fully managed, POSIX-compliant, parallel file system that delivers sub-millisecond latencies, millions of IOPS, and terabytes-per-second of aggregate throughput-performance characteristics that meet the simulation's bursty, high-IOPS window. A Lustre file system can be linked to an S3 bucket so that data is automatically imported when first accessed and automatically exported when files are changed or new files are written, eliminating custom copy scripts. EC2 instances simply mount the file system; no file-server cluster or storage management is required.
A Regional Amazon EFS file system provides multi-AZ availability but tops out at tens of gigabytes per second and hundreds of thousands of IOPS; it does not natively import/export to S3 and would require DataSync jobs, adding operational steps. A Multi-Attach io2 EBS volume is limited to 16 Nitro instances and needs a clustered file-system layer plus manual archiving, creating both scalability and management problems. Running an NFS cluster on EC2 with gp3 volumes similarly requires server maintenance and custom data-movement automation. Therefore, creating an Amazon FSx for Lustre file system that is linked to the S3 bucket with automatic import and export enabled is the only option that satisfies performance, scalability, S3 integration, and operational-overhead requirements.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is Amazon FSx for Lustre, and why is it suitable for high-performance computing workloads?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does FSx for Lustre automate data movement to and from Amazon S3?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are other solutions like Amazon EFS or io2 Multi-Attach volumes unsuitable for this workload?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
AWS Certified Solutions Architect Professional SAP-C02
Accelerate Workload Migration and Modernization
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
IT & Cybersecurity Package Join Premium for Full Access