AWS Certified Solutions Architect Associate SAA-C03 Practice Question
A company is planning to deploy a new web application aimed at users in Europe. Their primary focus is to minimize costs while ensuring low latency access for their users. Upon examination of their architecture and considering the AWS global infrastructure, which deployment approach should they take?
Deploy the application in the US East (N. Virginia) Region to lower costs
Deploy the application in the Asia Pacific (Sydney) Region to optimize infrastructure
Deploy the application in multiple regions globally for high availability, regardless of cost
The correct answer is to deploy the application in the EU (Ireland) Region, as it is commonly one of the most cost-effective AWS Regions in Europe. This approach ensures low latency for European users while optimizing costs. Other regions may either have higher costs or result in higher latency, which would not meet the company's primary objectives. It is essential to choose a region close to your user base for low latency, and within the regions available, one must consider cost differences. Deploying in the US East (N. Virginia) Region can be less expensive but would introduce higher latency for European users, countering their requirements, whereas deploying in Asia Pacific (Sydney) Region is geographically distant for European users, introducing unnecessary latency.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are the benefits of deploying in the EU (Ireland) Region specifically?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why does deploying in a far region, like US East (N. Virginia) or Asia Pacific (Sydney), increase latency?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What considerations should be made regarding high availability when deploying in a specific region?