During the preparation of a container-based environment, an organization uses automated files to define compute, networking, and storage settings. The team wants to find and fix misconfigurations in these files prior to resource creation. Which scanning approach best addresses this need?
A container analysis method that flags outdated library versions in images
An active technique that tests components after they initialize to uncover vulnerabilities
A method that inspects the configuration files before launching the resources
A passive process that looks for unusual traffic across network interfaces
A static technique that reviews the code at rest uncovers syntax problems, secrets, and insecure settings in deployment files before they are launched. Runtime-only or network-based methods often miss issues contained in these setup scripts, and container image reviews do not focus on environment templates.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is static analysis in the context of configuration files?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is static analysis preferred over runtime methods for environment templates?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What types of issues can static analysis detect in deployment files?