During an engagement, the lead identifies a flaw that could affect multiple teams within a client's organization. Which approach is best to confirm its severity with the correct contacts while maintaining an effective communication strategy?
Arrange a session with the designated contacts, present the findings, and request additional data for further examination
Post a short note in an open channel for key members across teams to respond
Notify specifically the testing team and omit visibility to other areas of the business until the final phase
Mention the flaw in a brief addition to a routine update, allowing managers to take appropriate action
Scheduling a dedicated discussion with the right individuals sets a structured path to handle severity, coordinate next steps, and confirm the potential impact on the organization. Posting notes in an open channel may lead to loss of structure or compromise confidential details. Adding a short mention in a routine update without specific guidance can cause confusion. Informing the testing team while excluding others misses important business and risk perspectives.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is it important to arrange a session with the designated contacts to address a flaw?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What risks could arise from posting about a flaw in an open channel?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does involving the testing team alone fail to address the flaw effectively?