During a security assessment, a team notices that certain network sections do not appear in the scan results. Which approach confirms that segments are not overlooked?
Compare discoveries with a documented network list to confirm segments are included
Initiate another scan from the original station to detect overlooked hosts
Review devices based on reported discrepancies, bypassing automated checks
Use the same scanning parameters to evaluate whether sections were ignored
Comparing the discovered devices with a listing of known segments detects areas left untested. Reusing identical scan setups often yields the same omissions. Relying solely on unverified accounts from individuals lacks methodical confirmation. Scanning again from the same station may not reveal additional hosts if the configuration remains unchanged.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is comparing discoveries with a documented network list effective for confirming all segments are tested?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What factors can cause certain network segments to be missed during a scan?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How can scanning from a different station improve results compared to re-scanning from the same one?