During a scheduled assessment, you identify extra actions beyond the original agreement in a location with uncertain guidelines, and the sponsor verbally supports proceeding. Which approach helps limit liability concerns?
Include an acknowledgment of the additional tasks during project review instead of revising the scope
Use the sponsor’s verbal approval and make a note of it for your own reference
Document the approval for the new tasks and reflect them in the updated project scope
Continue following the initial authorization without making further adjustments
When new responsibilities arise, an updated scope ensures better protection against misunderstandings and disputes. Verbal approvals or waiting until a project review to acknowledge extra work may lead to unresolved liability issues in environments with unclear regulations.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is it important to document updated project scope during an assessment?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Can verbal approvals be considered valid during a project assessment?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the risks of waiting until a project review to acknowledge extra tasks?