During a final briefing with an organization's leadership, the consultant wants to confirm the project outcome and provide next steps so that there is no confusion over any unresolved issues. Which approach meets these goals most effectively?
Organize a session with senior representatives to verify all objectives have been met, address final concerns, and document acceptance in writing
Publish the report online and wait for any department to comment if additional checks are needed
Wrap up testing after generating an initial draft and consider no further review unless the organization requests additional scans
Rely on an email from a mid-level manager saying the outcome is sufficient and distribute the result internally
Inviting key individuals to a concluding discussion and verifying the project is complete allows each finding to be reviewed and accepted before the official sign-off. This clarifies that the scope has been satisfied and gives the organization a final opportunity to address questions. Approaches that postpone further steps, skip in-person reviews, or rely on unverified statements can leave confusion about unresolved items or acceptance.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why is it important to have a session with senior representatives for project wrap-up?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are some potential issues with relying on a mid-level manager's email for project completion?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is it problematic to wrap up testing with just an initial draft report?