An assessor needs to evade detection from automated security scans that focus on suspicious commands. Which method best disguises the instructions so these scans cannot associate them with recognized patterns?
Transforming each portion of the script with a customized encoding process alters the identifiable traits in the code, reducing how easily scanning tools can detect malicious elements. Using file renaming or archiving typically preserves the structure of instructions. Changing code to a widely-used language does not inherently cloak recognizable patterns against signature-based scanning.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is customized encoding in the context of evading detection?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why don't methods like renaming files or compressing scripts work effectively for evasion?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How do automated security tools detect malicious scripts?