A tester identifies an older library in an application with a known path for code execution. The organization states they cannot remove it at this time. Which action helps highlight the severity of this weakness for planning remediation steps?
Suggest eliminating it and directing traffic elsewhere
Rename the library and isolate it within the environment
Conclude that it remains safe because filtering stops related network requests
Provide an example that demonstrates the code execution flaw
By showing how the flaw executes code, there is clear evidence confirming the vulnerability. Renaming or isolating the library does not demonstrate actual exploitation. Concluding it remains safe due to filtering ignores alternative attack vectors. Removing it outright before confirming the exploit might interrupt critical services.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is a code execution flaw?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is demonstrating the flaw important in vulnerability analysis?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does isolating or renaming a vulnerable library fail to address the issue?