As a penetration tester in the initial stage of assessing a target organization's external IT infrastructure, you need to gather intelligence on potentially vulnerable Internet-facing services without triggering security alerts. Which of the following tools would effectively enable passive reconnaissance to identify exposed services and devices, including specific versions and configurations, from publicly available information?
The correct answer is theHarvester. It is specifically designed to gather publicly available information such as email accounts, subdomain names, virtual hosts, open ports, and banners from different public sources like search engines and PGP key servers. This makes it suitable for passive reconnaissance. Nmap is typically employed for active scanning and could inadvertently set off security alarms if used inappropriately. SQLmap is an automatic SQL injection and database takeover tool, which is not intended for initial reconnaissance. CeWL creates custom wordlists from a given URL, useful for creating targeted password lists, but does not serve the purpose of identifying services and devices.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is passive reconnaissance in the context of penetration testing?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does theHarvester gather information?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is Nmap considered inappropriate for passive reconnaissance?