Your organization's standard operating procedure (SOP) states that any issue causing more than a 10 % cost variance must be escalated directly to the PMO. You are managing a small, low-risk internal software-update project with tight schedule constraints but modest budget exposure. While drafting the project governance plan, how should you define the escalation thresholds for this project?
Tailor escalation thresholds to the project's size, risk, and stakeholder tolerance while remaining aligned with organizational governance.
Adopt the SOP's 10 % cost-variance threshold exactly to maintain consistency across all projects.
Postpone defining escalation paths until the executing phase when actual variances appear.
Remove escalation thresholds entirely and escalate every issue immediately to the PMO since the project is small.
You should tailor the escalation thresholds to reflect the project's specific size, risk, and stakeholder tolerance levels while ensuring alignment with the organization's overall governance principles. Blindly adopting the SOP's 10 % cost variance may trigger unnecessary escalations for a low-budget project, whereas eliminating thresholds or delaying their definition undermines timely decision-making. Tailoring strikes the balance between consistency with organizational governance and practicality for the project's context.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are escalation paths in project management?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is a project governance structure?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why might project escalation paths differ from organizational procedures?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Project Management Professional
Process
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Project Management Package Join Premium for Full Access