During a project team's daily stand-up meetings, discussions frequently exceed the allotted time, causing delays in starting other tasks. Which of the following is the BEST approach to address this issue?
Allow discussions to continue until all issues are resolved.
Implement timeboxing to enforce meeting duration.
Replace daily meetings with detailed email updates.
Increase the meeting time to accommodate longer discussions.
Implementing timeboxing enforces a fixed duration for meetings, ensuring they start and end on schedule. This keeps discussions concise and focused, allowing team members to proceed with their tasks without delay. Increasing meeting time does not encourage efficiency and may lead to further scheduling issues. Replacing meetings with email updates eliminates face-to-face interaction, which can hinder immediate feedback and team cohesion. Allowing discussions to continue without time constraints can cause ongoing delays and reduce overall productivity.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is timeboxing in project management?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why are daily stand-up meetings important in a project?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are some common challenges with daily stand-up meetings?