A project manager receives a significant change request that will impact the project's scope and budget. To proceed appropriately, the project manager needs to identify who should make the decision regarding this change. Which role should be identified as the decision-maker in this situation?
The project sponsor should be identified as the decision-maker for significant changes affecting the project's scope and budget. The sponsor provides direction and funding for the project and has the authority to approve changes that impact high-level objectives. The technical lead may provide input on technical feasibility but does not have the authority to approve major scope changes. The procurement department handles purchasing and contracts but is not responsible for approving project changes. The quality assurance manager focuses on quality standards and testing, not on approving changes to scope and budget.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why does the project sponsor have authority over scope and budget changes?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does the project sponsor's role differ from the project manager's role in decision-making?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What input does the technical lead provide for change requests, and why can't they approve them?