A project manager is planning a new software development project and is deciding between Agile and Waterfall methodologies. They need to assemble their project team. Which of the following best describes how team size typically differs between Agile and Waterfall approaches?
Agile methodologies typically involve smaller teams for better collaboration, whereas Waterfall can handle larger team sizes.
Team size is irrelevant when choosing between Agile and Waterfall methodologies.
Waterfall methodologies require smaller teams due to their phased approach, while Agile supports larger teams for iterative development.
Both Agile and Waterfall methodologies recommend the same team size for optimal performance.
Agile methodologies favor smaller, cross-functional teams, usually consisting of 5-9 members, to enhance collaboration and adaptability. Smaller teams are more effective in Agile environments where rapid communication and flexibility are essential. In contrast, Waterfall methodologies can accommodate larger teams due to their structured and sequential nature, where tasks are divided among specialists working in defined phases. Therefore, understanding that Agile prefers smaller teams while Waterfall can function with larger teams is key.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are the main characteristics of Agile methodologies?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why does Agile favor smaller teams compared to Waterfall?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Can Waterfall methodologies be effective with smaller teams?