The correct answer is that the U.S. Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review a state court judgment only when the judgment is based on federal law and is not adequately supported by an independent and adequate state law ground. This doctrine ensures that the Supreme Court reviews only cases in which federal law was a necessary basis for the judgment. Other options fail because mere references to federal law or a mix of state and federal analysis do not necessarily mean the judgment depends on federal law. If state law alone is sufficient and independent in supporting the decision, the Court lacks jurisdiction.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'independent and adequate state law ground' mean?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why does the U.S. Supreme Court avoid reviewing cases based on state law?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What happens if a state court judgment involves both federal and state law grounds?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Multistate Bar Examination
Constitutional Law
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Pass with Confidence.
Bar Prep Package
You have hit the limits of our free tier, become a Premium Member today for unlimited access.
Military, Healthcare worker, Gov. employee or Teacher? See if you qualify for a Community Discount.
3 Month Pass
$299.99
$99.99/mo
One time purchase of $299.99, Does not auto-renew.
BEST DEAL
Lifetime Pass
$399.99
One time purchase, Good for life.
What You Get
All Bar Prep Package plans include the following perks and exams .