The state of Atlantia enacts the "Atlantia Clean Air Act," which imposes stricter air quality standards for industrial emissions than those mandated by federal law. A manufacturing company operating in Atlantia argues that complying with both Atlantia's and federal regulations imposes an undue burden. The company seeks a court declaration that the Atlantia Clean Air Act is preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause. Should the court find that the Atlantia Clean Air Act is preempted by federal law?
No, because the Supremacy Clause does not apply to environmental regulations.
Yes, because when state and federal laws conflict, federal law takes priority under the Supremacy Clause.
No, because states are permitted to establish more rigorous environmental standards than those set by the federal government.
Yes, because the state cannot impose regulations that differ from federal policies on air quality.
The correct answer is that states can implement more stringent environmental standards than federal law. Federal environmental statutes often allow states to adopt stricter regulations to address local concerns. Therefore, the Atlantia Clean Air Act is not preempted by federal law. Options suggesting that federal law always overrides state law in such contexts are incorrect because federal statutes typically permit more stringent state regulations when addressing specific local issues.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the Supremacy Clause and how does it work?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is the purpose of environmental regulations?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Can you provide examples of federal environmental statutes that allow for stricter state regulations?