Crucial Exams

Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

Sarah is on trial for theft. In her defense, she seeks to introduce testimony that she is a trustworthy and honest person who has never been involved in any criminal activities. Which statement best describes the admissibility of Sarah’s character evidence?

  • Sarah’s character evidence is admissible to prove she did not commit the theft.

  • Sarah’s character for honesty is admissible to establish her defense.

  • Sarah can introduce her honest character if corroborated by other evidence.

  • Sarah’s character evidence is inadmissible to prove she did not commit the theft.

Multistate Bar Examination
Evidence
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot