Crucial Exams

Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

Jordan operates a construction site and negligently secures scaffolding. A plank falls and injures Sam, who needs immediate medical care. Jordan places Sam in his car to drive him to the hospital. En route, an abrupt and violent lightning storm appears; a bolt strikes the roadway directly in front of the car, causing Jordan to swerve and collide with another vehicle. Sam suffers additional injuries in the collision.

Sam brings a negligence action against Jordan seeking compensation for both the injuries caused by the falling plank and the additional injuries sustained in the car accident. Jordan admits negligence with respect to the scaffolding but asserts that the lightning strike was a superseding cause that breaks the chain of proximate causation as to the car-accident injuries.

Which of the following facts, if proven, would provide Jordan with the strongest support for his superseding-cause defense?

  • Sam was not wearing a seat belt at the time of the collision.

  • The lightning strike was an abrupt, highly unusual natural occurrence that could not reasonably have been anticipated.

  • Emergency medical personnel later moved Sam negligently, aggravating his injuries.

  • The road on which Jordan was driving had a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour.

Multistate Bar Examination
Torts
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot