Crucial Exams

Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

Jordan is arrested for theft. During the police interrogation, Jordan is not informed of the Miranda rights. Without any warnings, Jordan admits to the theft. At trial, the prosecution wants to use Jordan's admission as evidence.

  • Jordan's statements are admissible because the police had probable cause for the arrest.

  • Jordan's statements are inadmissible because Miranda warnings were not provided.

  • Jordan's statements are admissible since theft is a non-violent offense.

  • Jordan's statements are admissible because Jordan voluntarily chose to speak.

Multistate Bar Examination
Criminal Law and Procedure
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot