In a negligence case, a witness states that the defendant appeared "agitated and kept shifting uncomfortably" during the event. The defense argues that this statement is an improper lay opinion. What should the court decide regarding the admissibility of the witness's statement?
Allow the testimony because it reflects the witness's perception of the defendant's behavior.
Disallow the testimony because it unduly influences the jury against the defendant.
Allow the testimony if the witness has experience in interpreting behavior.
Disallow the testimony because interpreting agitation requires specialized expertise.
The witness's statement is admissible as a lay opinion because it reflects the witness's direct perception of the defendant's behavior. Non-expert opinions based on personal observations that assist in understanding the witness's testimony are permitted. The other options incorrectly suggest that specialized expertise or potential jury influence invalidates the statement.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the significance of lay opinions in court?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What are the legal standards for admissibility of lay opinions?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does the concept of 'undue influence' apply to witness testimony?