Crucial Exams

Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

In a fraud case, the prosecution calls a witness to testify that they heard the defendant admit to the fraudulent activity during a private conversation. However, the witness was present in the room but did not hear any conversation between the defendant and the victim. Based on the requirement of personal knowledge, which statement is correct regarding the witness's testimony?

  • The witness's testimony is admissible based on their ability to infer what was said from reactions.

  • The witness's testimony is inadmissible as they did not hear the defendant admit to the fraudulent activity.

  • The witness's testimony is admissible contingent upon corroboration by other evidence.

  • The witness's testimony is admissible due to their presence in the same room during the conversation.

Multistate Bar Examination
Evidence
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot