During a trial, the prosecution seeks to introduce evidence that a defendant previously committed a minor theft. While this evidence might suggest a propensity for dishonesty, the defense argues that its potential to unfairly prejudice the jury outweighs its relevance. What is the BEST reason the court should exclude this evidence?
The evidence constitutes hearsay and lacks an applicable exception.
The evidence violates the defendant's right to confront witnesses.
The evidence's probative value is outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice.
The evidence is irrelevant to the issues being tried in the case.
The correct answer is based on Rule 403, which allows for the exclusion of evidence if its probative value is outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. Introducing prior minor thefts may unduly sway the jury's perception of the defendant's character, leading to prejudice rather than focusing on the facts of the current case.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'probative value' mean in legal terms?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is considered 'unfair prejudice' in the context of Rule 403?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Are there exceptions to introducing evidence of prior bad acts?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Multistate Bar Examination
Evidence
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Pass with Confidence.
Bar Prep Package
You have hit the limits of our free tier, become a Premium Member today for unlimited access.
Military, Healthcare worker, Gov. employee or Teacher? See if you qualify for a Community Discount.
3 Month Pass
$299.99
$99.99/mo
One time purchase of $299.99, Does not auto-renew.
BEST DEAL
Lifetime Pass
$399.99
One time purchase, Good for life.
What You Get
All Bar Prep Package plans include the following perks and exams .