Crucial Exams

Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

During a trial for embezzlement, the prosecution wants to introduce evidence that the defendant has been convicted of theft in the past. Under the FRE, is this character evidence admissible to prove that the defendant committed the current embezzlement?

  • No, because character evidence is not used to prove specific conduct.

  • No, unless the defendant introduces evidence of an alternative theory.

  • Yes, because past theft convictions are relevant to the current charge.

  • Yes, provided the defendant does not present evidence of good character.

Multistate Bar Examination
Evidence
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot