Crucial Exams

Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

Congress enacts the 'Federal Appliance Safety Act,' which establishes minimum safety standards for electrical appliances sold in interstate commerce. The Act includes a 'savings clause' stating: 'Compliance with this Act shall not relieve any person from liability under common law or state statutory law.' A state subsequently passes a law imposing stricter safety standards than those in the federal Act. A manufacturer, in full compliance with the federal Act, challenges the state law, arguing it is preempted. How are the courts most likely to rule?

  • The state law is preempted because the federal Act's comprehensive nature implies Congress intended to occupy the field of appliance safety.

  • The state law is preempted because it creates a conflict with the federal Act by making national uniformity impossible.

  • The state law is not preempted because the Tenth Amendment reserves the regulation of health and safety exclusively to the states.

  • The state law is not preempted due to the federal Act's savings clause, which indicates Congress's intent to preserve stricter state regulations.

Multistate Bar Examination
Constitutional Law
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot