A security officer at a shopping mall detains a shopper whom he reasonably believes is attempting to steal merchandise. During the detention, the officer uses physical force to restrict the individual's movement. The detained shopper sues the officer for battery. Which defense is most likely to be successfully raised by the security officer?
The correct answer is Defense of Property. Security officers are permitted to use reasonable force to protect property interests and prevent theft. Consent is not applicable here as the individual did not consent to the detention. Self-defense is not relevant unless there is a threat to the officer's person, and necessity typically involves preventing a greater harm rather than protecting property.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What constitutes 'reasonable force' in the context of defense of property?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does the defense of property differ from self-defense in legal claims?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is necessity not a valid defense in this scenario?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Multistate Bar Examination
Torts
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Pass with Confidence.
Bar Prep Package
You have hit the limits of our free tier, become a Premium Member today for unlimited access.
Military, Healthcare worker, Gov. employee or Teacher? See if you qualify for a Community Discount.
3 Month Pass
$299.99
$99.99/mo
One time purchase of $299.99, Does not auto-renew.
BEST DEAL
Lifetime Pass
$399.99
One time purchase, Good for life.
What You Get
All Bar Prep Package plans include the following perks and exams .