A security officer at a shopping mall detains a shopper whom he reasonably believes is attempting to steal merchandise. During the detention, the officer uses physical force to restrict the individual's movement. The detained shopper sues the officer for battery. Which defense is most likely to be successfully raised by the security officer?
The correct answer is Defense of Property. Security officers are permitted to use reasonable force to protect property interests and prevent theft. Consent is not applicable here as the individual did not consent to the detention. Self-defense is not relevant unless there is a threat to the officer's person, and necessity typically involves preventing a greater harm rather than protecting property.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What does 'Defense of Property' entail?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is considered 'reasonable force' in detaining someone?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why isn't 'consent' a viable defense in this situation?