Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

A pharmacy employee, diagnosed with a mental disorder affecting impulse control, intentionally sabotages a batch of prescription medications, making them unsafe. Afterward, the employee claims they were unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of their actions due to the disorder. However, they were able to physically plan and carry out the sabotage. Under these circumstances, which principle best evaluates the employee’s criminal liability?

  • Criminal liability is eliminated if the defendant’s mental disorder partially impaired but did not eliminate their physical ability to carry out the offense.

  • The appropriate test for determining insanity in this case examines whether the defendant could understand the wrongfulness of their conduct at the time of the offense.

  • The mental disorder defense focuses on whether the defendant displayed symptoms of their disorder during the offense without necessarily considering their full understanding of the act’s wrongfulness.

  • The defense will succeed if the mental disorder caused the defendant to experience significant cognitive or behavioral impairment at the time of the offense.

Multistate Bar Examination
Criminal Law and Procedure
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot