A group of citizens files a lawsuit in federal court challenging the President's formal recognition of a new foreign government. The lawsuit claims the President's action is contrary to the nation's best interests and established foreign policy. Which of the following justiciability doctrines is the court most likely to apply to dismiss the case?
The correct answer is the political question doctrine. This doctrine holds that courts will not adjudicate issues that the Constitution has textually committed to another branch of government. The power to recognize foreign governments is a foreign policy matter constitutionally committed to the executive branch. Therefore, a challenge to the President's decision in this area is considered a nonjusticiable political question. Mootness is incorrect because the dispute is ongoing. Ripeness is incorrect because the President's action has already occurred. Standing might also be a barrier for the citizens, but the political question doctrine is the most direct reason for dismissal given the nature of the governmental action being challenged.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are examples of cases that demonstrate the political question doctrine?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does 'justiciability' mean in this context?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
How does the political question doctrine relate to the separation of powers?