A firefighter enters a private residence without the homeowner's permission to extinguish a rapidly spreading fire that threatens nearby buildings. During the operation, the firefighter accidentally damages a valuable artwork in the home. Can the firefighter successfully claim a defense based on the protection of public interests?
No, since entering without consent is unauthorized.
Yes, because stopping the fire to protect the community justifies the firefighter's actions.
Yes, provided the firefighter seeks approval after the incident.
No, because causing damage to property is not justified.
The firefighter can claim the defense of protection of public interests because their intervention was necessary to prevent significant damage to the community. This necessity justifies the lack of consent and the incidental property damage. The other options either improperly emphasize the unauthorized entry or the property damage without addressing the overriding need to protect public safety.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What is the defense of necessity in legal terms?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why does public interest outweigh property damage in this case?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Are there limitations to invoking the necessity defense?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Multistate Bar Examination
Torts
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Pass with Confidence.
Bar Prep Package
You have hit the limits of our free tier, become a Premium Member today for unlimited access.
Military, Healthcare worker, Gov. employee or Teacher? See if you qualify for a Community Discount.
3 Month Pass
$299.99
$99.99/mo
One time purchase of $299.99, Does not auto-renew.
BEST DEAL
Lifetime Pass
$399.99
One time purchase, Good for life.
What You Get
All Bar Prep Package plans include the following perks and exams .