A federal judge was impeached by the House of Representatives and subsequently convicted by the Senate. The judge filed a lawsuit in federal court, arguing that the Senate's procedure-using a committee to hear evidence and report back to the full Senate-violated the constitutional clause stating the Senate shall have the 'sole Power to try all Impeachments.' The judge seeks judicial review of the conviction. How is the court most likely to rule on the judge's claim?
Grant review, because the Due Process Clause requires a full evidentiary hearing before the entire Senate.
Dismiss the case, because challenges to the impeachment process present a non-justiciable political question.
Grant review, because the case raises a federal question about the interpretation of constitutional procedures.
Dismiss the case, because the judge lacks standing to challenge the actions of the legislative branch.
The court will most likely dismiss the case because challenges to the impeachment process are considered non-justiciable political questions. In Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224 (1993), the Supreme Court held that a nearly identical claim was non-justiciable. The Court found that Article I, Section 3, Clause 6 of the Constitution, which grants the Senate the 'sole Power to try all Impeachments,' represents a 'textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department.' Furthermore, the Court concluded that there was a lack of judicially manageable standards for resolving what procedures are required for the Senate to 'try' an impeachment. Therefore, such questions are left to the legislative branch to resolve and are not subject to judicial review.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
Why are impeachment process challenges considered non-justiciable political questions?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What does the term 'non-justiciable political question' mean?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What precedent was established in Nixon v. United States regarding impeachment review?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Multistate Bar Examination
Constitutional Law
Your Score:
Report Issue
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Pass with Confidence.
Bar Prep Package
You have hit the limits of our free tier, become a Premium Member today for unlimited access.
Military, Healthcare worker, Gov. employee or Teacher? See if you qualify for a Community Discount.
3 Month Pass
$299.99
$99.99/mo
One time purchase of $299.99, Does not auto-renew.
BEST DEAL
Lifetime Pass
$399.99
One time purchase, Good for life.
What You Get
All Bar Prep Package plans include the following perks and exams .