Multistate Bar Examination Practice Question

A construction contractor and a property owner finalize and sign a written agreement for a commercial building project. The contract specifies that the owner will pay the contractor $1,000,000 upon completion of the work and includes an integration clause stating that the written agreement constitutes the full and final expression of the parties' agreement. Later, the contractor claims that, before signing, the owner verbally promised to approve additional payments for design changes deemed necessary by the contractor. The owner denies making such a promise and refuses to pay for the design changes. Can the contractor introduce evidence of the alleged verbal promise to modify the payment terms?

  • No, because the contractor must prove that the owner acted in bad faith during negotiations.

  • Yes, because design modifications were not addressed in the written contract.

  • Yes, because the verbal promise relates to a term missing from the written contract.

  • No, because the written contract is considered integrated and the parol evidence rule prevents admission of prior verbal agreements that conflict with the written terms.

Multistate Bar Examination
Contracts
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot