Crucial Exams

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Practice Question

Pat and Deena are partners at Greenbridge Law. Pat represented a hardware distributor in litigation against a manufacturer. That matter is now finished, but it involved confidential pricing strategies that are still relevant. A month later, the same manufacturer asks Deena to represent it in a closely related lawsuit against the distributor over a new supply agreement. Deena had no involvement in Pat's earlier representation. Under the ABA Model Rules, may Deena undertake the new representation?

  • No. The conflict is imputed to Deena, and she may proceed only if both the distributor and the manufacturer give informed written consent.

  • Yes. Once Pat's earlier representation concluded, the firm is free to act adversely to the distributor in a related matter.

  • Yes, if Pat is strictly screened from the new case; no client consent is required once a timely screen is in place.

  • Yes. Because Deena did not work on Pat's matter, the conflict is personal to Pat and does not bar her representation.

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam
Conflicts of interest
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot