Crucial Exams

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Practice Question

Morgan’s client wishes to delay a scheduled hearing for personal convenience. Morgan files identical motions to reschedule the matter multiple times, knowing there is no further legal or strategic justification to do so. What is the best assessment of her conduct?

  • Filing repeated delay requests is ethically justified when the client finds them helpful

  • This is typical throughout the process of litigation

  • Multiple motions to postpone without a legitimate reason violate professional obligations

  • Delays are acceptable if the opposing side has not challenged them

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam
Litigation and other forms of advocacy
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot