Crucial Exams

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam Practice Question

A lawyer was upset with a judge’s rulings over several weeks and gave public comments blaming the judge for favoring one party. The lawyer did not share any supporting evidence. Which option aligns with professional guidance on criticizing judges?

  • Express criticisms based on factual information and refrain from making unsupported claims

  • Limit remarks to private gatherings instead of making critical observations in public settings

  • Speak in public forums to emphasize constitutional rights without necessarily relying on evidentiary support

  • File a grievance while refraining from making comments on a judge’s actions outside formal channels

Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam
Lawyers’ duties to the public and the legal system
Your Score:
Settings & Objectives
Random Mixed
Questions are selected randomly from all chosen topics, with a preference for those you haven’t seen before. You may see several questions from the same objective or domain in a row.
Rotate by Objective
Questions cycle through each objective or domain in turn, helping you avoid long streaks of questions from the same area. You may see some repeat questions, but the distribution will be more balanced across topics.

Check or uncheck an objective to set which questions you will receive.

Wipe Score
Bash, the Crucial Exams Chat Bot
AI Bot